Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 6th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Council boss told to justify £190,000 salary



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
10 October 2008
County Hall boss Ged Fitzgerald is the country's 10th top earning council chief executive, new findings have revealed.
The former Sunderland Council chief scored a bumper rise of almost £20,000 a year when he arrived at Lancashire County Council earlier this year and now earns £190,000 a year.

That is more than the Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who pulls in £188,848 a year.

An investigation into the salaries of chiefs at 111 authorities by a national newspaper has revealed that just nine other chief executives earn a salary of more than or equal to Mr Fitzgerald, whose pay is almost three times the basic wage of an MP.

Michael Jack MP for the Fylde said: "If someone is doing an exceptional job and producing for whoever they are employed by an extremely good result then sometimes it is worth paying a premium.

"What the public get hacked off about is people being paid large sums of money for not doing anything additional or special.

"So it is very important when it comes to the running of the county council that the people who appointed Mr Fitzgerald make it very clear what attracted them to appoint him and what he should be delivering."

Matthew Sinclair, policy analyst at the Taxpayers' Alliance said: "We are far from convinced that these officials are really justifying these salaries in terms of results."

But since Mr Fitzgerald took over at LCC in June, the council has retained its four star excellent rating from Audit Commission watchdogs.

The full article contains 262 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 October 2008 7:57 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

emjharrison1984,

10/10/2008 08:54:29
No wonder the country is skint when these lot get hundreds of thousands of pounds! Can any of them justify it? Like the PM apart from lying what more does he do? The real people who defend the country should be the ones who should get paid a greater salary! How on earth can anyone justify this kind of money?
2

outdoorboy,

10/10/2008 09:22:53
is this the guy that has probably lost £23 mill in iceland? how do you justify £190000 pay packet then.
3

David C,

10/10/2008 09:31:30
I would be just as happy with his £20k pay rise. No one can Jusify over £50,000 a year. There'll always Monkey boys below him that take the rap. Sack him and Employ someone for £50,000 that will sort out his mess.
4

barnfarm,

10/10/2008 10:08:30
Agreed. The days of six figure salaries for these people have to be over. Unemployment is gonna soar. People are losing their homes. And this geezer - with a CV of at best average achievement and at worst abject failure - is going to keep soaking £190,000 out of one of Britain's poorest counties?

Actually, yes, he is. Unless people get off their ar$es and do something about it.
5

Dreddnought,

10/10/2008 10:56:56
And yet again the knee-jerk brigade speaks. The fact is this guy could earn twice as much in an equivalent role in the private sector. You pay peanuts, you get monkeys, dropping the salries of local authority chief executives would be disastrous. And to blame this guy for the perceived 'mess' of the Icelandic banks situation is ridiculous as he's only had the job since May!
6

ConfusedLad,

10/10/2008 11:09:45
"The fact is this guy could earn twice as much in an equivalent role in the private sector"

I'm fed up hearing this justification. If the lad *could* earn twice as much in the private sector then he'd be off like a shot!

How many ex-council execs *do* actually leave to work in the private sector? Is the number so high that this is a real concern?? I think the truch is that life is much less stressful and much more secure (and lucrative!) on the public gravy train, so people stay. I also think that many public servants would really struggle to make it in an "equivalent role" in the great 'outside'.

Put it to the test - we've got monkeys anyway, let's face it. Start paying them the peanuts they deserve and see whether they stay.
7

David C,

10/10/2008 11:11:14
Dreddnought, then he should apply and sod off and leave the public purse £190,000 better off. There should be no one over £50,000 a year thats working for the public. Specailly when he on more than the Prime minister.
8

David Becker,

10/10/2008 11:36:57
We seem to go through this every year. Is the salary justified? Possibly not. But what really winds me up isn't the salary of the Chief Executive who, whatever we think of it, is in overall charge of an organisation with more staff and greater importance to the region than virtually any private sector firm in the county.

No, what winds me up is the hypocritical garbage that come from MPs like Michael Jack who claimed £136,591 in expenses last year!! And of course he completely misses the point that a) the Prime Minister is an elected politician, b) that in all walks of life it is supply and demand that dictate salaries and c) that the package of the Prime Minister is actually far in excess of £190k when you add in cars, helicopters, houses, planes, media work and all the other expenses that Chief Executives certainly don't see.
9

outdoorboy,

10/10/2008 11:52:52
Dreddnought i dont care how long he has been in the job i dont see the lancs council as one person who was on mega bucks before him/her and him/her? come on!!
10

outdoorboy,

10/10/2008 11:55:20
Dreddnought we are all thick T****** so why dont you just go and collect tax of people with a brain im happy with that. whos's with me?
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.