Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 11th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Protection bid for city's heritage



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
07 August 2008
City leaders are to give themselves greater powers to protect some of Preston's architectural gems.
The ruling cabinet of Preston Council is expected to pass plans next week to strengthen its control over what can be built in conservation areas such as the Deepdale Enclosure and the former Harris orphanage site.

It is hoped the changes will see these areas extended to take in larger chunks of the city.

Council leader Ken Hudson said the changes were part of the cabinet's "drive to preserve the architectural heritage" of all parts of the city.

He said: "It is very important that as the newest city in the country we not only regenerate where we can but retain the rich heritage we have which goes back to 1179.

"These changes will improve our ability to take a strong stance on planning matters especially in these conservation areas."

The cabinet will meet next Wednesday to vote on the matter.
But Linda Barton, of Preston Historical Society, said she feared plans to regenerate historic areas such as Winckley Square, the Flag Market and other city centre sites could see some architectural gems lost.

She said: "We are not against redevelopment in the right place and time, but we fear this is what happened in the 1960s and '80s all over again. Back then the east side of Winckley Square was destroyed. It would be criminal to allow that to happen again."

The full article contains 242 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 August 2008 9:46 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

barnfarm,

07/08/2008 11:52:20
Architectural gems? Midget gems perhaps. And the last people I'd trust to understand what's worth saving are the council. Winckley Square anyone?
2

Kells95e,

preston 07/08/2008 13:09:24
Why o why do we call ourselves a "city" ????
We are a large town, always have been, always will be, sticking a couple of extra buildings on a second rate polytechnic and calling it a university, doesn't make it a city!!!! End of !!!!!
3

David C,

07/08/2008 14:01:02
Kells95e, Preston is a City has been since 2002. As for this extra power that the council has. Well its another nail in the History of the City. The council can just decided nope its not an important building, knock it down. Like they're doing with the Tithebarn project.
4

K Darragh,

leyland 08/08/2008 02:28:41
Give it up guys,were a Chav society here,stop it,there is no culture left...unfortunately!Were like all towns...Mcdonalds,Debenhams,Ladbroks...etc...get real!!
5

K Darragh,

leyland 08/08/2008 02:31:04
Ladbrooks...fat finger,soz......lets get ready for the Xmas lights fiasco and whos payin....again...boring and LEP will bring it up AGAIN!!!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.