Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 6th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Council refused to collect dead pet



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 September 2008
A man was stunned when council workers told him they would not pick up a cat he had just seen killed – because he had moved it to his front garden.
Gavin Mitchell, 30, saw the cat hit by a motorist as he left for work on Lytham Road, Fulwood.

He immediately called the cleansing team at Preston Council, but was told by two different workers that because he moved it on to his property it was no
w his responsibility and not the council's problem.

Telecom worker Gavin said: "I could not believe what I was hearing. I tried to do the right thing and give someone's pet a bit of dignity, and some of my neighbours have young children so I didn't want them seeing it.

"To call the council and get the reaction I did, well, I could not believe it.

"I even jokingly said to them 'would you come and get it if I threw it back in the road' and they just laughed and said they probably would.

"This is what you get for trying to be a good citizen."

After being called by the Evening Post, council bosses had a change of heart and agreed to collect the animal and to try and track down its owner.

A council spokesman apologised for the misunderstanding and said the workers Mr Mitchell spoke to had been following procedures to the letter of the law.

He said that officers spoke to Mr Mitchell Friday afternoon to arrange a time to collect the animal, after the incident earlier in the morning.

The spokesman said: "Preston Council will remove dead animals from the highway within operating hours, between 8am-4pm.

"If the animal is fitted with an ID chip or collar we will contact the owners.

"If residents remove an animal from the highway to prevent the public from seeing it, contact the council and we will arrange removal."







The full article contains 324 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 September 2008 12:03 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
2
1

Ribbledrivel,

Preston 28/09/2008 12:10:43
Enough with the dramatic pauses LEP.
Using - all the time does not automatically make a story stronger. We're not total retards.
2

schmeichel,

28/09/2008 15:00:56
Sadly, ribbledrivel in your case, your posts on this website prove that you are exactly what you describe above.

Oh, the irony
3

Bill Carson,

Broadgate 28/09/2008 18:18:41
Just how pathetic is our society becoming?

A dead cat is not a reportable accident so why trouble the council? If it had no ID collar, the guy who felt so compelled to remove it from sight should have either binned it or buried it in his own garden. It's called common sense.

But no, the automatic response these days is to call the council with such a trivial issue and then the local press when, quite rightly, they laugh in your face.

Get over it.
4

Hudds,

28/09/2008 18:37:32
Bill Carson - so would you rather the man in question have left the dead cat lying in the road, probably to be run over by other vehicles and cause distress to children walking to school? It's likely the cat was a family pet and the family may have have come across the body.
Perhaps if someone ever came across your dead body they should leave it or burn it as you so suggest? Mind you, it's obvious you are missing a heart as it is.
This man was being a good citizen and in my opinion we need more people like him and less people like you.
5

,

28/09/2008 19:34:46
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
6

E. Pike,

28/09/2008 21:06:13
It's a sign of the times when we have petty jobs worths using any pedantic interpretation of rules to avoid undertaking their basic responsibilities.
I suppose it must be hard to take a pride in the service you provide when you are paid to clear up other people's mess. I imagine that this sort of obstructive behaviour is a highlight in their otherwise vacuous existence.
7

Sam Tana,

Ribbleton 29/09/2008 01:11:57
Workers are terrified of taking the initiative and then being hauled over the coals for it later, so of course they "follow procedures to the letter of the law". But in any case, it's not the council's job to dispose of dead pets so they have to be sure that people aren't simply using them as a free way of getting rid of little Tiddles once it's used up its 9 lives.

I hope the council manages to trace the cat's owner - and sends them a bill for the disposal job.
8

Bill Carson,

29/09/2008 11:33:05
Hudds - In no way did I suggest he leave the cat in the road, he could have dealt with it himself. No-one is obliged to report a dead cat to the authorities. Furthermore, children must learn that pets and wild animals that are left to roam often get run over, it's a fact of life.

So if ever your granny's flat is being burgled it would be OK for the police and council to excuse themselves because they were busy dealing with a dead cat?

Please take a reality check!
9

Wizard of Oz,

Cairns 29/09/2008 12:38:17
Schmeichel,#2 comment.
Re "Oh the irony" Riverdribble is an oxymoron (check your dictionary).
Keep up the good work RD, always a hoot to read your witticism's.
Anyone for Chinese?
PS, I knew Toxic Terry too.........
10

PW,

29/09/2008 13:07:28
`We're not total retards.` No just 80% a retard.
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.